Add some more articles
This commit is contained in:
20
radar/2017-03-01/resilience-thinking.md
Normal file
20
radar/2017-03-01/resilience-thinking.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Resilience thinking"
|
||||
ring: trial
|
||||
quadrant: methods-and-patterns
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Resilience is the cabability of an application or service to resist different error scenarios. Especially for distributed systems - where a lot of communication between different services happen - it's very important to explicitly think of implementing resilience.
|
||||
|
||||
There are a lot of different resilience patterns and it is also a matter of the overall software design. Typical patterns and methods used are:
|
||||
|
||||
* Do not hide API calls or any other external communication in your application (for example with unnecessary abstraction) - instead make it explicit that an external communication happens - e.g. by using the Facade Pattern. On the one hand, this makes it obvious that a potential slow and errorprone communication is going to happen, and it makes it easier to implement error handling.
|
||||
* Detect errors explicitly: Check the response message format and configure proper timeouts for external communication
|
||||
* Handle errors in a smart way: Show a nice error message to your customer or, even better, graceful degrade features - e.g. by showing some fallback text
|
||||
* Use Message-based communication where useful ([Decoupling Infrastructure via Messaging](/methods-and-patterns/decoupling-infrastructure-via-messaging.html))
|
||||
* Use Circuit Breaker to Isolate errors and allow system to recover
|
||||
* Use short activation paths in your strategic architecture - so that there is only a minimal set of communications between your services required for certain features or business requests
|
||||
|
||||
"Embrace Errors" should be the mindset - because its not a question if errors appear - it's just a question of when.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user