20 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
20 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Resilience thinking"
|
|
ring: trial
|
|
quadrant: methods-and-patterns
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resilience is the cabability of an application or service to resist different error scenarios. Especially for distributed systems - where a lot of communication between different services happen - it's very important to explicitly think of implementing resilience.
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of different resilience patterns and it is also a matter of the overall software design. Typical patterns and methods used are:
|
|
|
|
* Do not hide API calls or any other external communication in your application (for example with unnecessary abstraction) - instead make it explicit that an external communication happens - e.g. by using the Facade Pattern. On the one hand, this makes it obvious that a potential slow and errorprone communication is going to happen, and it makes it easier to implement error handling.
|
|
* Detect errors explicitly: Check the response message format and configure proper timeouts for external communication
|
|
* Handle errors in a smart way: Show a nice error message to your customer or, even better, graceful degrade features - e.g. by showing some fallback text
|
|
* Use Message-based communication where useful ([Decoupling Infrastructure via Messaging](/methods-and-patterns/decoupling-infrastructure-via-messaging.html))
|
|
* Use Circuit Breaker to Isolate errors and allow system to recover
|
|
* Use short activation paths in your strategic architecture - so that there is only a minimal set of communications between your services required for certain features or business requests
|
|
|
|
"Embrace Errors" should be the mindset - because its not a question if errors appear - it's just a question of when. |